
Give AI the context your work needs
Turn selected notes, documents and emails into a useful work profile. Let AI find the gaps, ask you better questions and save the context for next time.

An illustrative example: customers can’t find their saved projects. AI could help Support reply, Product plan an improvement, and Engineering prepare a fix.
Uses the help guide to draft a clear reply. Groups similar reports into a pattern: “Customers can’t find their saved projects.”
Check the reply before sending it and confirm whether the reports point to the same problem.
Brings that pattern together with product goals and sketches a proposal: “Show where the project was saved, with a link to open it.”
Confirm the cause, choose the right improvement, and approve a plan for Engineering.
After approval, a connected coding tool can use the plan and codebase to draft a change with tests, ready for an engineer to review.
Review the code, run the tests, and decide whether it is ready to release.
The common thread. Customer feedback, product knowledge, and company goals carry through each step. In a connected setup, an approved handoff can trigger AI to prepare the next team’s draft.
This is one possibility for a connected system. Training can start with a single step; the tools, access, and wider implementation are agreed separately.
Fill in this prompt with a task and the company context behind it. It can help you find a small, useful starting point to discuss with your colleagues.
Hello Aristotle
Help us find one practical way for AI to improve work across teams, using shared company context.
OUR GOAL
[What are we trying to achieve? Include the goals of the teams involved.]
THE WORK
[Describe a recurring task or problem, which teams touch it, and where work slows down.]
WHAT AI COULD WORK FROM
[Summarize relevant customer feedback, product information, policies, metrics, or other knowledge we are allowed to share.]
OUR TOOLS
[Name the approved tools and connections we already have. Write “unknown” for anything uncertain.]
Suggest three opportunities in plain language. For each, explain what AI could prepare, how it would help the next team, and which shared information it needs. Consider better quality and alignment as well as more output.
Recommend one small starting point and explain why. Map it in a short table: team, input, AI draft, human decision, and what passes to the next team. Flag conflicting goals, missing evidence, and any connections that would need to be set up.
If numbers are involved, keep their sources, time periods, and definitions visible. Mark unattributed results unknown. A pattern does not prove cause: suggest what to check before changing a budget or plan.
Finish with a simple practice exercise we can try using a safe sample, and how we could judge whether it helped. Ask up to three questions if essential information is missing.
Use only the information supplied. Do not invent results or assume our tools are connected. Suggest drafts and plans only. Do not contact anyone, change systems, or publish anything.
Pick a task below and open the prompt. Replace the brackets with information you can share in your company’s approved AI tool, then review the result with the team who’ll use it.
Hello Aristotle
Help Support and Product turn customer feedback into a useful product brief.
Customer notes, with identifying details removed:
[PASTE NOTES]
Current product guidance:
[PASTE RELEVANT GUIDANCE]
Our company and Product goals:
[ADD GOALS]
Group the problems customers describe. For each, show the source evidence, what the customer was trying to do, and how it relates to our goals. Separate reported problems from possible explanations.
Suggest one problem to explore first and explain why. Draft a short Product brief: problem, evidence, questions to investigate, and what a better customer experience could look like. Flag missing or conflicting information. Don’t infer how widespread a problem is from a few reports.
Finish with what Support should verify and what Product needs to decide. Prepare a draft only; don’t send it or change any systems.
Hello Aristotle
Help Product prepare an approved idea for Engineering to review.
Approved Product brief:
[PASTE BRIEF]
Relevant product behavior and technical constraints:
[ADD SOURCES, OR WRITE “UNKNOWN”]
Our goal and limits for this change:
[ADD GOAL, SCOPE, AND CONSTRAINTS]
Write a short implementation brief covering the user outcome, confirmed requirements, what is outside the agreed scope, and decisions still needed. Keep proposed details separate from approved requirements.
Suggest acceptance checks tied to the intended behavior, including useful edge cases. Show which source supports each requirement. If the brief doesn’t establish an expected result, turn it into a question for Product.
List the technical questions Engineering should resolve before planning the change. Don’t invent a cause, choose an architecture, estimate effort, or write code. Product confirms intent; Engineering checks feasibility and the proposed tests.
Hello Aristotle
Help Marketing and Product decide what to investigate next using the information below.
Campaign results, audience, and dates:
[PASTE AGGREGATE RESULTS]
Product usage and customer feedback, with dates:
[PASTE APPROVED AGGREGATE DATA AND REDACTED FEEDBACK]
Shared business goal:
[ADD GOAL]
Create a short comparison table: signal, source, time period, what it tells us, and what it cannot tell us. Keep campaign engagement, product behavior, and customer comments separate. Flag mismatched periods, missing definitions, and missing attribution.
If our shared goal is missing, ask us for it first. Otherwise, suggest three questions the teams could answer together, then recommend one small investigation that would help our goal. Name the evidence we’d need and how we could judge the result.
Don’t treat correlation as proof that a campaign caused product use, invent missing numbers, or recommend a budget change as settled. Marketing and Product should check the interpretation before acting.
We’ll shape training around what your company wants to achieve, then practice on work your people recognize.
Tell us what you want your company to accomplish. Preparation can be a quick discussion of priorities, or a deeper look through team conversations and the resources people use.
Give AI the company knowledge, team goals, and instructions it needs. Practice using that context to prepare better work for the next person.
Work through a task, compare the results, and keep useful prompts or instructions. Colleagues can adapt that approach to other work. We’ll agree the starting scope and any larger implementation separately.
Is keeping commitments moving between departments your first priority? Explore AI training for operations teams.

You’ll work with the founder of Hello Aristotle, a business operator who uses AI in his own work. Bring a business goal, a problem that keeps coming back, or a team that wants to do more with AI.
We’ll connect the possibilities to work your people recognize, help them practice, and work through what makes the results useful.
Meet Sydney Liu →A learner’s experience from an individual session with Sydney.
“I work in finance and felt like I was falling behind. After one short session with Hello Aristotle, I had real ways to improve my workflows and the confidence to keep exploring. Sydney breaks things down in a way that’s easily digestible!”
Yes! Tell us about the range in the group. Someone opening an AI tool for the first time needs a different starting point from a daily user. We’ll discuss how to make the training useful for both.
Tell us what your organization already allows, whether that’s ChatGPT, Claude, or another tool. We’ll work out the setup before the session. Use fictional or appropriately redacted practice material if real work can’t be shared in that tool.
We start with at least one hour so there’s time to get the foundations right. Group size, total duration, and format are flexible. We’ll discuss the preparation, scope, and price before you commit. The free 20-minute call helps us work out where to start.
Yes. For example, AI could compare campaign results with what those customers do in your product, then prepare a shared report for Marketing and Product. Leaders can use it to ask better questions about where to invest, with gaps in the data made clear.
A practical way to give AI the company and team context it needs, plus prompts, instructions, or a workflow they can adapt. We’ll agree what’s worth building in your session and discuss any follow-up you want.
We offer Aristotle Certificates for reaching practical proficiency milestones. They aren’t an accredited qualification or an employer certificate. We can discuss which skills you want your people to demonstrate in their work.
Workshops are one option. We’ll choose an approach that fits your team and what you want to accomplish.
Several teams need to work together. Bring a shared goal or a piece of work that passes between departments. We can explore where AI could help each group and what they need from one another.
People need different levels of help. Tell us where beginners and experienced users are starting. We can discuss whether they should practice together or whether a different arrangement would serve them better.
You need a larger implementation. If the need includes a company-wide rollout, systems integration, or ongoing support, describe that early. We’ll discuss what can be included in the agreed scope.
Tell us what you want your people to accomplish. In a free 20-minute call, we’ll explore where AI could help and what training could look like for your team.
Book a free 20-minute call